Classification and Priority Guide
Priority Matrix
| Priority |
Criteria |
| hoch |
Compliance-critical, certification blocker, regulatory deadline, security gap |
| mittel |
Quality improvement, process gap, cross-ref improvement, content deepening |
| niedrig |
Nice-to-have, cosmetic, optimization, knowledge base enrichment |
Evaluation Criteria
Automated checks run during the evaluate step:
- YAML Completeness — Verify required aufgabe fields (title, type, management_system, classification, status) and vorschlag-specific fields (kategorie, quelle, erstellt_am) are present
- Norm Reference Validation — Extract norm references from body text (e.g. ISO 9001 7.1.6, DSGVO Art. 33) and validate against known prefixes
- Duplicate Detection — Search the target vault area for files with overlapping title keywords (2+ matches) or matching norm references
- Scope Estimation — Count .md files in the target vault area to estimate effort:
- klein: 1-5 files
- mittel: 6-20 files
- gross: 20+ files
- Dependency Mapping — Find vault files across all areas that reference the same norms, to identify cross-cutting concerns
Triage Decisions
Accept (Small) — stays as aufgabe
- Single file fix or update
- Clear scope, estimable in < 2 hours
- Set
zustaendig, frist, prioritaet
- Add
Umsetzungsschritte checklist to body
Accept (Large) — create GitHub Issue
- Multi-file change (5-20 files)
- Needs coordination or research
- Create GitHub Issue with IMS label
- Add issue URL to aufgabe body as reference
- Set
zustaendig and frist on the aufgabe
Accept (CWP) — create Content Work Package
- 20+ files affected or new domain area
- Requires structured sprint approach
- Flag for CWP creation in
.content-state.yaml
- Use
/vt-v-cwp to set up the new CWP
Defer
- Valid item but not urgent
- Set
frist to a future triage date (e.g. 3 months out)
- Add note in body explaining deferral reason
- Keep
status: offen, keep zustaendig: null
Reject
- Not applicable, duplicate, or out of scope
- Set
status: erledigt
- Set
erledigt_am to today
- Add note explaining rejection reason
Source-Based Priority Hints
| Source |
Default Priority |
regulatorisch |
hoch (regulatory deadlines are fixed) |
vorfall |
hoch (prevent recurrence) |
audit |
mittel (systematic improvement) |
management-review |
mittel (strategic direction) |
gap-analyse |
mittel (proactive closure) |
team |
niedrig (unless compliance-related) |